Why comparisons deserve their own hub
A large share of research questions are not 'what is this compound' but 'how does this compound differ from that one'. Those questions are poorly served by two separate overviews, because the differences that matter are relational: mechanism family, molecular size, solubility behaviour, analytical treatment and the shape of the published literature.
Collecting comparisons in one place also prevents a common content problem. When every compound page carries its own comparison section, the site accumulates near-duplicate passages that dilute each page and confuse search engines about which one answers the question. A single authoritative comparison, linked from both sides, is stronger for readers and for indexing.
The comparisons here span both compounds and methods, because choosing between two analytical techniques is the same kind of decision as choosing between two candidate sequences: you need the axes, not a verdict.